tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5666114716955489883.post2479637119093167754..comments2024-02-14T22:57:55.638-05:00Comments on The Cross of Laeken: Political Testament, Part IIIUnknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5666114716955489883.post-48655252232000794542010-07-31T12:05:07.280-04:002010-07-31T12:05:07.280-04:00That's a good question. Unfortunately, I don&#...That's a good question. Unfortunately, I don't know enough about the details of his economic theory. His words seem a bit general. His position precluded favoring one school of thought over another, at least publicly. And corporatism itself is a bit hard to pin down, since there are different kinds.Mayhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/18230268418171628594noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5666114716955489883.post-90486689891196041342010-07-31T00:06:12.303-04:002010-07-31T00:06:12.303-04:00This may be something of a "hot button" ...This may be something of a "hot button" but, reading this, I must ask if in your studying of King Leopold III, do you think he was or would have been supportive of the corporate/corporatist model? His words about class and economic "collaboration and solidarity" prompt me to ask.MadMonarchisthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08083008336883267870noreply@blogger.com